Summary: The Linlithgow's criticisms and Mudaliar's views on developing alternative associations with Telegraph are reflected in various correspondences. Schuster's letter to Linlithgow and Devonshire's reference in Lords debate highlight the possibility of alternative associations with Telegraph. Amery hopes for an improvement in attitude from TIMES. Twynam's criticisms and Phillips' impressions are noted. The support for the idea of a fact-finding commission by TIMES is evident. VICEROYALTY succession and Private Secretaryship references are made. The Turkish Mission to India is discussed. The UNION OF SOVIET UNITED PROVINCES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are mentioned, along with ULSTER, UNIONIST PARTY (PUNJAB), UNITED NATIONS, and various other international topics. Discussions on broadcasting, social and economic policies for India, and Indian Services, as well as the concern over the stability of public services, are detailed in the exchanges between the correspondents. There are also discussions on the role of Judges in political activities and the need for non-identified moderate groups to work out constitutional problems for India post-war. The series of letters and telegrams show a wide range of concerns and discussions regarding the political, social, and economic aspects of India during this period.