Summary: In the text "(If K <SL, V' 211), the commentator discusses the ethical implications of the king's actions in accordance with the law. The author contrasts the protection given by good kings in the past with the erratic rule of the present, highlighting the importance of righteousness in governance. The text emphasizes the binding nature of canons consistent with righteousness and refutes the plea that kings are exempt from sin. It illustrates how sacrificing one's own self in battle is questioned morally. The author's critiques reflect a divergence from the older Daruman authors. The discussion delves into the influence of the Arthasastra on canonical texts like the Manusamhit and the Mahabharata, signaling a shift in political thought towards Arthasastra's dominance. The text shows how political theories evolved, while subsequent authors incorporated Arthasastra principles to establish the science of polity in Hindu literature.