Summary: In the case of a lesser sentence being inflicted, the Calcutta High Court reserved judgment in the Jaiganj rice looting case. Advocates for the accused were denied access to the explanation submitted by the prosecution, leading to objections. The Chief Justice directed copies to be made available, citing confidentiality practices from England. In another case, the Sessions Judge acquitted the accused in Chittoor, ruling that the order prohibiting meetings and processions was "ultra vires". Additionally, in the Nagpur contempt case, the Court fined the Jail Superintendent and censured the Inspector-General of Prisons for failure to forward an application to the High Court, highlighting a disregard for the Court's authority and demanding accountability from those in authoritative roles. The judgment emphasized the importance of upholding the integrity of the legal system and preventing misconduct.